 |
|
|
|
|
|
Skullsplitters
Football Freak
3322 posts
|
|
|
 |
Posted - 10/9/2006 5:24:40 PM |
 |
 |
rules proposal for 2007
|
|
|
|
let's get rid of the retarded "gotta keep a player on your roster for two weeks" rule. it's a pain in my arse as it isn't automated, and it just causes problems.
heck, i'd even get rid of it going forward, if that's ok with everyone. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maulers
Football Freak
997 posts
 |
Fu: 100.96 |
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/9/2006 6:21:24 PM |
|
|
Great idea!
|
|
|
|
| I see no real reason to have it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bunch
Assistant Coach
135 posts
|
Fu: 0.00 |
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/9/2006 10:14:17 PM |
|
|
Anyone interested in a RB?
|
|
|
|
| I am looking for a WR. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/9/2006 10:16:58 PM |
|
|
fine with me.....
|
|
|
|
| fuck that rule. its done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/11/2006 7:57:24 AM |
|
|
yea, fuck that rule.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/11/2006 9:45:12 AM |
|
|
ditto.
|
|
|
|
fuck that rule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bunch
Assistant Coach
135 posts
|
Fu: 0.00 |
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/11/2006 11:59:57 AM |
|
|
I vote for a flex player next year.
|
|
|
|
| What does everyone think about the ability to start 3 RB and 2 WR in a given week? I think it makes sense now that there are bye weeks with 6 teams. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/11/2006 8:10:44 PM |
|
|
WR Walters team is wrong
|
|
|
|
| He's on Arizona, not Indy. Please fix, as he may have a catch this weekend. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/12/2006 11:14:51 AM |
|
|
Walters..
|
|
|
|
| But wouldn't Walters be better off in the long run on Indy? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/12/2006 2:06:43 PM |
|
|
Bruins: Great nicknames
|
|
|
|
| Damon WHO?-ard is my personal favorite. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/12/2006 3:22:29 PM |
|
|
Thanks
|
|
|
|
| With my schedule I've seen like a quarter of football all year so far, so it's like I'm just playing Fantasy Stats. Furthermore, when you lose three games by thirteen pts, (two games by three!), and then score 15 all week, you gotta find some fun somewhere... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/16/2006 7:53:59 AM |
|
|
Flex Player - not RBs. Maybe TEs?
|
|
|
|
| This week's scramble for WRs definitely lends credence to Bawkins' flex player idea. But i worry about the flex player being a RB. RBs are already at a premium in this league, and allowing teams to start 3 could make the position even more valuable. Additionally, the scoring structure was created with the concept of 2 starting runners and 3 starting receivers per team (WRs score less per yard than RBs), and a RB flex would circumvent that structure. I'd be OK with a rule allowing teams to start TEs at the WR position, at least during weeks such as this one. For one thing, it wouldn't dramatically change the makeup of a lineup; you'd still start two runners and three receivers. And it may make TEs a little more valuable, which probably isn't a bad thing considering how many NFL teams are utilizing TEs more in the past few years. Of course, having said all this, i'm also OK with the status quo on this topic - so what if you need to scramble? It led to some pretty fun trading this week, which isn't a bad thing. I just don't want to see more RB influence in this league. That's my primary concern. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/17/2006 8:00:56 AM |
|
|
does anyone know that the board has different threads?
|
|
|
|
by keeping 2007 rules proposals in their own area, we can easily refer to them during the offseason. this board is a mess.
so i'll chime in on this current thread - anyone want my chili recipe? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/17/2006 8:43:51 AM |
|
|
yea, dose it have ground beef in it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/17/2006 9:46:04 AM |
|
|
Using threads
|
|
|
|
| Can threads be sorted by last posting date, or the thread title be more prominent? That'd help me use the threads better. I'm too stupid/lazy to find the right thread in the current forum structure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 10/17/2006 11:00:00 AM |
|
|
I agree
|
|
|
|
Jeremy is stupid and lazy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
