|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 6/28/2017 7:07:23 AM |
|
|
Rule 1
|
|
|
|
As eye-opening as it was to have a vote on rule 21.1, it's hard to ignore Rule 1 of the rule book that has Keith plainly listed as benevolent dictator. As we get into the weeds of 21.2, I just want to reaffirm that the benevolent dictator concept is fine with me. I'm not going to denigrate democracy, and appreciate the benefits of a vote. But I feel like the 21.1 vote didn't go all that well. Seemed like we entered a sort of grey zone, where Keith is the ultimate decision maker but there's also a "binding" vote. And there were conflicting votes, which didn't help things. It was all too unstable to me. If we do things differently in Rule 21.2, and lean back towards Rule 1, that's fine with me. Above all, I trust Keith to do things for the right reasons. So however we move forward, I think we'll be alright. |
|
|
|
|