 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted - 6/11/2004 2:01:44 PM |
 |
 |
Flex Position
|
|
|
|
Anyone interested in having and additional starting spot, a flex position which would be either an RB, WR or TE? We have two possible starting allignments in the OCFL (which I like) and this would be similar to that, adding more flexibility for your weekly starting line-up.
Vulture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
jd
Tape Junkie
55 posts
 |
Fu: 0.00 |
|
|
|
|
Posted - 6/12/2004 9:12:12 PM |
|
|
I like that . . .
|
|
|
|
| adds a little spice to the mix. Count me in for that! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 6/16/2004 8:55:32 AM |
|
|
not a big fan of flex
|
|
|
|
| sorry to be a contrarian, but i'm not a big fan of the flex idea, simply because of the wide variations in scoring potential of those three positions. if the flex position were between WRs and TEs for example, i'd be more willing to consider it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 6/17/2004 11:41:34 PM |
|
|
Flex
|
|
|
|
| I vote no, if it were between wr and te maybe, but to include running back seems to much and not a true flex postions. |
|
|
|
|
|
