 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pollution
Coordinator
152 posts
 |
Fu: 93.60 |
|
|
|
 |
Posted - 8/27/2009 7:09:00 PM |
 |
 |
More points for sacks?
|
|
|
|
| one point per sack up to five..after five...six to ten being worth 2 points each? How many times does a team have more than five sacks in a game? It should be awarded..please change the rules..if the league agrees. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 8/29/2009 12:39:19 AM |
|
|
I agree more points for sacks
|
|
|
|
| 3 sacks per game will give a defense 48 sacks. That is normally enough to lead the league or be close. So 48 sacks is the equivalent to 1500 rushing yards about. That is about 94 yards per game or 9 points. By contrast 3 sacks generates only 1 point. This needs to be increased. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 8/29/2009 9:42:13 AM |
|
|
Good luck
|
|
|
|
| The current scoring system has pretty much neutered DF's so that only the top three or so are even really worth a roster slot. I've tried for years to argue that DF's should be worth more, but to no avail. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 8/29/2009 6:26:49 PM |
|
|
I may have erred...
|
|
|
|
After reviewing the stats for last year, it seems that DF score more than I thought. The Eagle scored 130 fantasy points last year, which puts them ahead of Tyler Thigpen, Matt Forte, and way ahead of the number one scorer in all other categories.
If any position is under-valued it has to be TEs. Not a single one broke the 100 point barrier, and this is a position that only starts one player per week like QB and DF. QB's roll in the points by comparison to any other position. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Masochistic toys
Football Freak
529 posts
 |
Fu: 99.57 |
|
|
|
|
Posted - 8/29/2009 8:08:24 PM |
|
|
Can't do it!
|
|
|
|
| I hate the TE position. They are all a bunch of sissies. Kellen Winslow, Tony Gonzelas, Antonio Gates......Fairies! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 8/30/2009 7:54:16 AM |
|
|
Dare ya
|
|
|
|
| Try calling Heath Miller a fairie! |
|
|
|
|
|
