 |
|
|
|
|
|
jd
Tape Junkie
55 posts
|
|
|
 |
Posted - 11/9/2003 9:00:22 AM |
 |
 |
Simple = good
|
|
|
|
| It sounds easier to just have Week 14 even things up . . . I'm fine with that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 11/9/2003 9:48:34 AM |
|
|
Let's go with simple
|
|
|
|
I think if we could hold off on determining the actual matchups so that we can try to incorporate some of the mini playoff idea, that'd be great. And for certain each week 14 matchup should be a non-division game. Other than that, I think it would work just fine.
So my vote is for the "easy" solution for the moment. Though maybe we could discuss this again in the offseason and create a finalized system that allows for the week 14 mini-playoff, the one thing this new plan screws up.
jeremy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted - 11/9/2003 10:07:09 AM |
|
|
I wonder if home-and-away should be canned in 2004
|
|
|
|
| We will have to come up with a symmetrical schedule in order for this to work in a 10-team league. I don't know if that is mathematically possible. In any case, going with a Week 14 (2003) schedule of 6-home @ 5-home will probably get us by. We should determine the exact matchups this week, though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dan
Scout
76 posts
 |
Fu: 0.00 |
|
|
|
|
Posted - 11/9/2003 11:46:01 AM |
|
|
simple ok with me
|
|
|
|
I think if we could hold off on determining the actual matchups so that we can try to incorporate some of the mini playoff idea, that'd be great. And for certain each week 14 matchup should be a non-division game. Other than that, I think it would work just fine.
So my vote is for the "easy" solution for the moment. Though maybe we could discuss this again in the offseason and create a finalized system that allows for the week 14 mini-playoff, the one thing this new plan screws up.
jeremy
|
|
|
|
|
|
